Is now a good hour to launch a token on Robinhood Chain? Measured hourly against Solana and Base, because attention is roughly zero‑sum across chains.
Demand for new tokens is running ahead of supply right now.
Provisional. This reads today's raw numbers against the last 6 hours and the other chains. The full score, which compares against the same hour of the same weekday over four weeks, starts once the bot has seven days of history.
A z‑score against the same hour‑of‑week is meaningless until there is a week to compare with, so no verdict is published before then. Every number below is live and real; only the score is withheld.
24h volume · biggest is not the same as fastest growing
Where the launches are actually going. Tokens are counted on chain by the router that created them, so a pad shows up whether or not any index lists it. The hottest pad is the one growing fastest day over day, not simply the biggest.
ranked on what actually graduates · 8 technical, 1 meme
Ranked by measurement, not taste. All 321 tokens that have graduated on
Pons were classified by theme from their name and description, the same classifier
was run over 3,027 launches sampled evenly across the full 339,000-launch history,
and each theme scored on lift — its share of winners divided by its
share of launches. That controls for the fact that a theme can look popular simply
because everyone launches it.
Thin themes were shrunk toward 1.0 (derivatives showed 3.14× off two winners),
and each theme is capped at two entries — uncapped, the list returns four
interchangeable tokenised-stock ideas. Lift is evidence of a better prior, not a
promise: the base rate on Pons is 2.8%, so 2.70× means roughly
7.6%, not a sure thing.
Tokenised equity float — real shares wrapped so the supply on chain matches the register.
A ticker registry — every wrapped stock gets one canonical symbol nobody can squat.
Message passing between Robinhood Chain and everywhere else.
Liquidity locked by contract with the release date public from block one.
Trading fees split pro rata to holders every block, no claim transaction.
Yield that streams by the second instead of landing in a weekly lump.
A cat coin. No mechanism, no roadmap — it wins on the picture or not at all.
An agent that reads the tape and posts its calls on chain, wrong ones included.
Autopilot for a treasury: rules in, rebalances out, every action logged.
The retirement account joke, played straight: locked, vesting, on chain.
the whole chain, not just new tokens
in plain terms
every token created this hour, and how few of them trade
Most tokens minted on Robinhood Chain never trade once. They are a fixed template with identical seeded liquidity and no buyers. Counting them as competition is the difference between reading the chain as permanently crowded and reading it correctly, so the score uses real launches, not the raw count.
traded indexed, never traded not indexed
share of all DEX volume going into tokens under 24h old
The headline demand measure. Total chain volume is a bad signal on its own because most of it is established pairs and tokenised equities.
hover a dimmed row to see why it is unavailable
five inputs, weighted · Robinhood Chain
A metric that fails to fetch is dropped, never zeroed, and the remaining weights are renormalised. Below half the total weight, no score is published at all.
| input | latest | z | weight | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| fresh vol share | 5.13% | — | 0.30 | insufficient baseline: 0.2d of history, need 7d |
| grad rate lagged | — | — | 0.25 | insufficient baseline: 0.2d of history, need 7d |
| real launches 1h inverted | 131 | — | 0.20 | insufficient baseline: 0.2d of history, need 7d |
| kol fresh buyers | — | — | 0.15 | insufficient baseline: 0.2d of history, need 7d |
| fresh unique buyers | 346 | — | 0.10 | insufficient baseline: 0.2d of history, need 7d |
Inverted inputs count in reverse: fewer real competitors is a better window. z‑scores are winsorised to ±3 so one extreme metric cannot swamp the other four.